|
Post by Makayla Rieder on Feb 12, 2018 4:44:06 GMT
@laura I agree that having militarized zones to collect water isn’t very efficient if people can corrupt it, and the solution that you proposed would be a pretty good option, but what if someone literally has to go over their limit for something? What if they have a baby and they use all of their water and it gets shut off and they need that extra water just to feed their baby. I completely understand where you’re coming from but i don’t think shutting off the taps would be much more efficient than militarized water zones. I also don’t think it would stop violence. People would just line up outside of law enforcement buildings or water storage centers and have riots. Either way they would end up getting their point across.
|
|
|
Post by Makayla Rieder on Feb 12, 2018 4:54:07 GMT
@barbie We literally need water to live, so i do think it is a right, but if people use up all of their water and are still freely using it when they know it’s about to run out, then they should treat it as a privilege. The people who are doing a lot to keep their water usage down are the ones that understand that after they run out, there’s nothing left and they don’t want to have t rely on other places in the world to donate their water until they’re stable with again, which could take years and they can’t rely on others for years to give them something that they need to survive.
|
|